The Supreme Court sought reports on the three-language formula for Class 9 from July 2026, noting "hardship" concerns. The author critically views the government's casual enforcement via CBSE as a "political decision," disregarding students and parents. The abrupt mandate, requiring two Indian languages, faces legal challenges. Petitioners cite constitutional grounds, personal choice, and question CBSE’s authority, highlighting NEP flexibility. Concerns persist over student pressure, teacher shortages, and resource inadequacy. The text urges the Centre to course-correct this detrimental "cultural battleground."