The author asserts that human gatekeeping in academia, arts, and admissions is inherently biased, subjective, and inadequate for evaluating vast creations. He critiques AI CEOs' self-regulation proposals, advocating a radical AI-led solution. He proposes a “Humans of AI” foundation, funded by AI firms, to dismantle elite opinion tyranny. This AI system would impartially assess scientific papers, college applications, and creative works. Trained by diverse public input, it would democratize prestige, unearth overlooked talent, and replace flawed human judgment with a more objective, transparent evaluation process, despite acknowledging minor risks.