The Supreme Court of India is critically concerned about AI hallucinations in judicial processes, likening it to methyl isocyanate due to its insidious, catastrophic potential. The Court has overturned rulings based on fictitious AI-generated citations, emphasizing its strict, cautionary approach. While AI may assist, it cannot replace human reasoning or judicial discretion. Relying on fabricated AI material is deemed professional misconduct for advocates and a serious judicial lapse. Regulations prohibit AI in adjudications, sentencing, or deciding bail. Disciplinary actions are mandated for lawyers citing unverified AI, asserting justice must not be hallucinated.